[ITmedia Mobile] 約8000円で有線CarPlay車両にHDMI入力を追加できる「APP HDMI IN 2」を試す

· · 来源:user在线

One thing that allowed software to evolve much faster than most other human fields is the fact the discipline is less anchored to patents and protections (and this, in turn, is likely as it is because of a sharing culture around the software). If the copyright law were more stringent, we could likely not have what we have today. Is the protection of single individuals' interests and companies more important than the general evolution of human culture? I don’t think so, and, besides, the copyright law is a common playfield: the rules are the same for all. Moreover, it is not a stretch to say that despite a more relaxed approach, software remains one of the fields where it is simpler to make money; it does not look like the business side was impacted by the ability to reimplement things. Probably, the contrary is true: think of how many businesses were made possible by an open source software stack (not that OSS is mostly made of copies, but it definitely inherited many ideas about past systems). I believe, even with AI, those fundamental tensions remain all valid. Reimplementations are cheap to make, but this is the new playfield for all of us, and just reimplementing things in an automated fashion, without putting something novel inside, in terms of ideas, engineering, functionalities, will have modest value in the long run. What will matter is the exact way you create something: Is it well designed, interesting to use, supported, somewhat novel, fast, documented and useful? Moreover, this time the inbalance of force is in the right direction: big corporations always had the ability to spend obscene amounts of money in order to copy systems, provide them in a way that is irresistible for users (free, for many years, for instance, to later switch model) and position themselves as leaders of ideas they didn’t really invent. Now, small groups of individuals can do the same to big companies' software systems: they can compete on ideas now that a synthetic workforce is cheaper for many.

Силовые структуры

NYT Pips hints

這種藥物通常用於腎臟移植患者,以防止器官排斥反應。出乎醫生意料,他用這款藥物讓自己的卡斯爾曼病退卻,如今已緩解超過十年。。WhatsApp Web 網頁版登入是该领域的重要参考

dealing with package repositories, mirrors going down in the middle of,推荐阅读谷歌获取更多信息

Названа не

“把算力送上天,不是为了离地球更远,而是为了离每一个人更近。”刘垚圻如是说。。whatsapp对此有专业解读

미국은 미사일이 부족하다? 현대전 바꾼 ‘가성비의 역습’[딥다이브]